“If you have courage and convictions, your new soulmate will be Steve Deace. He delivers.” —Mike Huckabee

Radio shows

The Empire Strikes Back

By Steve Deace

After two consecutive primary cycles best known for a conservative grassroots/Tea Party rebellion against the Republican Party establishment, the empire is striking back with a vengeance.

With establishment proxy Mitt Romney all but assured of being the party’s presidential standard-bearer, his acolytes are in Tampa running roughshod over the pre-convention rules committee according to little birdies I’ve spoken to down there.

“Romney’s people came out Friday and just ran amendment after amendment to get back control of the party,” one Little Birdie said. “They’re angering a lot of people in a turn out the base election. It’s almost like they don’t want to win the election this fall.”

Little Birdies highlighted two rules changes in particular that should concern grassroots conservatives/Tea Partiers.

“They’re trying to make it that every four years the party platform has to be approved by the nominee for president,” one Little Birdie said. “That means the enduring principles that make most of us Republicans would essentially be held up for approval by whoever wins the presidential nomination. Imagine the party establishment re-defining our platform if given the chance.”

The mainstream media has noted the Republican Party platform says there are no exceptions to the sanctity of life, while this week the Romney campaign said it would consent to killing children conceived in rape and incest like RNC delegate Rebecca Kiessling. The party platform also opposes mandates like the one found in Romneycare.

But that’s not all.

“The establishment wants to remove penalties for states that move their primaries or caucuses ahead of Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina to be removed,” one Little Birdie said. “That means a liberal, pro-establishment, big money state like California or New York could jump ahead of those more conservative states, and an establishment candidate could essentially try and buy the nomination in a Democrat state before conservatives even have a say.”

How might those rules have impacted the 2012 primary process?

“If states jumped ahead of the traditional early states in 2012, they lost up to half of their delegates,” a Little Birdie said. “If the rules are changed, that won’t happen. So if a bunch of big money blue states jump ahead of the early states, you can take underfunded candidates that social conservatives favor like Rick Santorum and forget that happening again. He’s exactly the kind of candidate that they’re trying to stop.”

Earlier this year the underdog Santorum captured the first in the nation Iowa Caucuses, and won a total of 11 states despite being dramatically out-spent by Romney. This pushed the primary battle into mid-April when in 2008 it was essentially over by the first of March.

Can anything be done to stop these rules from being ratified?

“The full convention still has to approve the amendments from the rules committee, but in the past that’s been almost automatic,” a Little Birdie said. “That’s why we’ve got to get the word out about this. Between what I’ve seen these people down here trying to do to the kinds of grassroots people that have supported Mike Huckabee and Ron Paul the past two cycles, they’re almost giving their own base incentive to not want Romney to win. Because of all the primary losses, (the establishment) is trying to put rules in place that leaves them in charge for a long time if Romney wins.”

One of the most respected conservative grassroots leaders in the country, Morton Blackwell of the Leadership Institute, called the Romney campaign’s takeover attempt “the most awful proposed amendments I’ve seen presented to this committee.”

You can friend “Steve Deace” on Facebook or follow him on Twitter @SteveDeaceShow.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Joel-Kurtinitis/207304484 Joel Kurtinitis

    Thanks for bringing attention to this. Much of what’s going on is specifically aimed at caucus states like Iowa. These changes are a slap in the face to our state party and an unwarranted consolidation of power. If the nationals persist in cutting chunks out of their own base and insulting the states, they had better be prepared for the consequences this fall. Despite our best efforts, this will likely hurt Republican turnout in November, nowhere more than our own swing state of Iowa.

    • Vunderkint

      Joel, I think people will turn out on election day because of the grassroots movement initiating a state-by-state turnover in local governments, people will vote in their local elections in a strategy of making change from the bottom up. I think many people have written off the presidential election as a lose lose proposition unless they are still falling for the pragmatism over principle banana in their tailpipe that played a crucial role in getting us in the situation we are in with out-of-control big government.

      We have an illegal alien sanctuary county sheriff that is refusing to do his job that needs his walking papers and other local races to win and above all give the Iowa Senate majority leader and much deserved kick to the curb!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Cody-D-Darr/1286912441 Cody D Darr

    Meh… The GOP is dead; long live the GOP…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1177763492 Monte Goodyk

    The GOP through these actions has indirectly told 10% of it’s base voters to stay home in November. These moves are almost as bold as the Executive Orders Obama is signing on a regular basis. Makes you wonder if Romney wouldn’t continue circumventing congress as Obama has.

  • http://www.facebook.com/david.jeffers.188 David Jeffers

    If Willard pulls this off, which it looks like he might, it will be the end of the GOP as we know it. Not sure why I don’t think that’s a bad thing.

  • http://twitter.com/erikcharter Erik Charter

    Why the surprise that the middle of the Republican Party controls the rules & the agenda? To the victor go the spoils. If Conservatives don’t vote for Romney Obama wins and we get the devil we know vs. the semi-devil we don’t know (don’t know as President, anyway). What were you expecting from politics?

  • http://twitter.com/erikcharter Erik Charter

    Christian Conservatives threatening to stay home is like African Americans threatening to stay home. Our parties are just not that scared because the worst we do is stay home. We’re not going to vote for the other guy because we know he’s worse.

  • http://twitter.com/erikcharter Erik Charter

    I was a 100% political idealist in 2008. Today I am a 100% political pragmatist. And doggone it, I’m o.k. with that.

  • http://twitter.com/erikcharter Erik Charter

    Ron Paul in the Caucus. Mitt Romney in the general. Sleeping like a baby.

  • Chris Nelson

    Until we get rid of open primaries, conservatism is dead in the RINO party. That is why we have this socialist/pagan/conservative hating goon as the R nominee.

  • http://www.facebook.com/whozahnfirst Debi Adamson Zahn

    Erik, the establishment isn’t afraid of people not coming out to vote? Then they are more moronic than I thought, and that really is saying something! I, for one, am not voting for a devil, whether semi-devil or full-fledged. If the establishment keeps disenfranchising their base, they can count on not HAVING a “franchise” for much longer.

  • http://twitter.com/erikcharter Erik Charter

    Debi – They are more concerned with winning the middle than the fringes of the party, as are the Democrats. Especially leading up to an election. How is Romney a devil or semi-devil? He appears to be a good family man and a good businessman. Who would be an example of a non-devil that has been President using your standards? What are your standards for a political leader? Is Romney running to be President of all Americans or only the President of Christian Conservatives?

    • cyclorider007

      I can see you know next to nothing about Mitt.

    • Vunderkint

      Anyone who has researched Romney’s political record knows that the man tried to run left of Ted Kennedy for the Senate, he is a two-faced political chameleon that was exposed as a liar in 2008 claiming hidden cameras in a radio interview that was false. He did not get this flip-flopping reputation for nothing. The man takes easily evolving positions instead of having core convictions that people can trust.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQwrB1vu74c&feature=colike

      http://www.massresistance.org/romney/

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Randy-Crawford/1171661673 Randy Crawford

    Neither Obama nor Romney is worth a vote. Staying home and sucking your thumb only encourages them. The only alternative is to stand up and do a write-in vote, no matter how impossible it is for your better example to win. For every write-in vote, the puppermasters know there are a thousand others out there who aren’t total fools and who are looking for something better than what is currently peddled. When those thousands and thousands jettison the babysitting puppetmasters and abandon the status quo by the millions, the puppetmasters will be swept away. It all starts with the first step.

    • Vunderkint

      Agreed Randy, but it’s going to take faith and courage to a level that I have not seen in the American electorate as yet but maybe that will change.

    • kristymom

      Neither obama nor romney is worth a vote, that is true. I can write in here in Texas and know my vote will not cost us another 4 years of Obama. People in swing states, however, really need to vote for romney, no matter how much they have to hold their nose to do so. because our nation CANNOT afford another four years of obama.
      We at the grassroots level need to do a lot of work in the next two to four years. 1.) We need to figure out a way to get a more balanced media. The media picked romeny for us by convincing a lot of gullible people that he is the only one who can beat obama. Truth is, he was the only one who could possibly lose to obama.
      2.) We need to get some word out to educate less involved potential voters on HOW to do the research on the various candidates, so they don’t just go vote for whoever ABC, NBC, FOX, or some flyer they got in the mail tell them to. Really scary how few people actually do their homework before they go vote!
      3.) We need to educate EVERYONE on the importance of primaries. I cannot tell you how many people told me “I may not vote in the primaries but I will be there in November to vote out Obama.” To which I respond, REALLY? So you don’t care who you will be voting FOR, just who you will vote against?
      4.) PRAY PRAY PRAY and when your knees are worn out, PRAY SOME MORE! Only God can turn our nation back to the greatness we once had when we actually were one nation under God!
      Fact is, our education system has educated the informed citizen right out of us, more people are interested in Hollywood than Washington. When we get large numbers of people who are actually concerned about the direction our nation is going to really educate themselves, the “party elites” will lose all say to We the people. Which is exactly the way it should be!

    • http://twitter.com/erikcharter Erik Charter

      If the path is narrow as the Bible says why do you think that Christian conservatives will ever have enough of a majority to elect their candidates to national office? Are you too optimistic about what we can gain from politics?

  • HawkeyeGOP

    Steve, you and I don’t always see eye to eye, but on this one we agree 100%.

    –David Chung

  • cyclorider007

    A vote for Romney will only create more Romney’s and hammer the final nail into the coffin of (real) conservatism.

    The solution is easy. Don’t vote for the establishment candidate — ever. Not in the primary. Not in the general.

    ONLY THEN will true conservatives take back the party.

  • cyclorider007

    One pro-life website calls Obama “the lesser of two evils” and I’m inclined to agree. When you read Romney’s horrifying record on abortion, you’ll know why.

    http://prolifeprofiles.com/mitt-romney-abortion

    In Romney, we have a profiteer from the abortion holocaust — literally.

    http://www.nowpublic.com/health/mitt-romney-s-abortion-business-made-him-50m

    More abortions = more tiny bodies to burn = more $$$ for Romney.

  • http://twitter.com/erikcharter Erik Charter

    A brief “Primer on Evangelical Worship for Wayward Reformed Youth” at http://www.literatecomments.com. Touches on the interaction between evangelicals and politics a bit.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003334633536 Chris Downey

    The nominee approving the platform sounds shocking, but it may be exactly what’s needed to bring the GOP up to the level of the Democrat’s integrity. And please don’t read any irony into that statement. I mean it literally.

    The GOP is a laughing stock precisely because the gullible grassroots can gather ’round in their platform committee meetings, even say a pious prayer in Jesus’ name–then go out and vote for a platform that says one thing and a candidate that does the opposite just because the Party bosses tell them to.
    If you really believe those precious platitudes you labor over, then vote against nominee (that would be Romney, this week). Otherwise, shut up, give it up, and go along.

Deace on TV