“If you have courage and convictions, your new soulmate will be Steve Deace. He delivers.” —Mike Huckabee

Radio shows

Go Big or Go Home

By Steve Deace

The decision by over 100 pro-life/pro-family leaders to endorse Rick Santorum for president after meeting together in Texas was the big news of the weekend, but that vote of confidence will have very little impact on the eventual outcome of the Republican presidential primary unless the group puts its considerable resources behind it.

Beyond their own preference for Santorum for president, if these Christian leaders needed any added incentive to put some capital behind their political capital to make it meaningful, they should understand that from this point forward their long-term political clout is directly tied to Santorum’s presidential bid.

That’s because the Republican Party establishment and the liberal media have a common interest here, and that’s rendering Christian conservatives’ voice in the political process meaningless and ineffective. Both want to discredit Christian virtue and Christian political activism, so both will be watching very carefully to see if this group is able to re-boot Santorum’s stalled momentum in South Carolina and beyond.

Just giving a long-time social conservative like Santorum an ‘atta boy’ helmet sticker won’t be sufficient to move his numbers. These leaders will need to put their considerable resources on the line for the anemically-funded Santorum. They’re now on the primary ballot right along with him in the minds of the Republicrat establishment and the mainstream media.

Unless these leaders go “all in” for Santorum, they could make the division among conservatives even worse, thus making Mitt Romney’s path to the nomination  – and the party establishment’s mission to marginalize social issues — even easier.

At a time when the Republican Party leadership is just looking for an excuse to banish Christians to the kids’ table, not being able to move a true social conservative like Santorum in a socially conservative state like South Carolina will give the establishment all the excuse it needs to do just that.

These leaders endorsed someone that has stood for their issues for many years, and now they need to put their money where their mouth is to make the endorsement stick. Otherwise, they’re more likely to hurt Newt Gingrich thereby helping Romney more so than Santorum.

If that is the result of their actions they will get pinged from the party establishment/media on one side for being paper tigers, and conservatives who will feel let down they weighed in to dilute Gingrich’s vote at a time polls show him closing on Romney in South Carolina on the other.

While it is hopeful to see this group of leaders come together in this primary for Santorum after never coming together to help Mike Huckabee four years ago, the calendar is not their friend at this point. The South Carolina primary is Saturday, and the chances of this group creating a successful coalescing behind a “not Romney” candidate would be greater had they acted with more foresight well in advance.

Nevertheless, better late than never, and there are three immediate action steps this group could deploy to show they are serious in supporting Santorum:

1) Put out a joint press release ASAP (like Monday at the latest) calling on Rick Perry to get out of the race. Whether Perry heeds their call or not, that press release would essentially end his campaign regardless. There’s no need for his going nowhere candidacy to be an unnecessary stalking horse for Mittens.

2) No piecemeal, individual endorsements over time but rather a show of force by the group as a whole. I would suggest staging a mass press conference in South Carolina with Santorum no later than Tuesday to send a message that this group is united and serious. This needs to look like a show of force to really move numbers and create momentum.

3) If Ron Paul can raise $6 million in a one day money bomb independent of any mainstream fundraising apparatus, there’s no excuse for Santorum not to have $10-20 million in his campaign coffers by the Florida primary given the combined mailing lists of these pro-life/pro-family groups. If they had everyone on their list send Santorum a one-time gift of just $5 apiece he’d have Romney-like resources overnight. If Santorum is not flushed with cash from this soon the endorsement will look weak/symbolic, and it will only help Willard by stalling any momentum Newt may or may not have to stop him in South Carolina.

Many of these leaders have expressed a desire to me and others not to make the same mistake that was made by not supporting Huckabee in 2008, but if they don’t put their resources behind this Santorum endorsement they’ll make an even bigger mistake in 2012 by self-cannibalizing their own political capital in full view of the party establishment and the mainstream media.

Bottom line: if these leaders are going to wade into the deep side of the pool they better know how to swim. As Margaret Thatcher once famously said on the eve of Operation Desert Storm: “This is no time to get wobbly, George.”

Go big or go home.

 

 

 

  • Anonymous

    What should the 25% of this group who voted for Gingrich do?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_B3PV7CIYVQLOGB2Q74MD4FEZUQ BobJ

      If you come to a meeting like this looking for consensus….you go with the consensus.

      • Anonymous

        Don’t believe that happened according to the story about Barna, JC Watts, etc.

    • Bbchris79

      If you read this article it sounds like they all went in agreeing to the same terms. Of course for a few of them that was only if their chosen one won. This “coalescing” followed by bickering will only nullify their entire purpose for meeting, and damage the reputation of all “Christian conservative” groups. I pray that I am wrong.
      http://www.christianpost.com/news/why-did-social-conservative-leaders-pick-santorum-67225/

  • Gregg Jackson

    All of these leading Christian pro-family and pro-life groups must also fully expose Romney’s far left wing record from his $50 abortions to his illegal implementation of same-sex “marriage” and promise that if Romney becomes the nominee that they won’t support him against Obama since the “lesser of two evils” is still evil.

    Many of these leading groups from Focus on the Family to Family Research Council to the American Center for Law and Justice to National Right to Life to Concerned Women of America have totally white-washed Romney’s record for over half a decade now.

    It’s time for Christian leaders to actually lead and choose this day whom they will serve!

    • Anonymous

      I could be wrong but my guess is they will do like other Pro-life groups/people have said and that is of course we will support Romney if he is the nominee, after all anyone is better than Obama.

      For the life of me I can’t understand the reason behind saying these kind of things before three states have voted. I get it if a politician says this stuff but Christian leaders aren’t politicians.

  • Pingback: Go Big or Go Home | Steve Deace - christianfamiliesnetwork.com - christian families network

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1481354920 Craig Bergman

    You are right in what they SHOULD do, but they will NOT do it, because a great many of them do not intend for this to elect Santorum, but to provide themselves cover when they eventually endorse Romney.

  • SoCon 4 Ron

    Speaking as a Christian social conservative and a civil libertarian who spends a lot of time along our northern border, I think we`re making a huge mistake in overlooking Ron Paul. Especially when we consider what is going on up in Canada where, despite a
    conservative government, Christians are being denied their civil
    liberties by lifestyle activists backed by government tribunals.

    Yeah, I too found it a tough choice with Gingrich and Santorum running. But
    as we`re seeing with same-sex marriage, America is only a few years
    behind Canada, and right now the biggest challenge to Christians in
    Canada is activist quasi-judicial tribunals trying to suppress the right
    of Christians to adhere to Biblical values.

    Just google Linda Gibbons, Scott Brockie, Fr. Alphonse de Valk,
    Pastor Stephen Boissoin, Human Rights Commission, and Christian Horizons
    for a real eye-opener when Christians lose their civil liberties. And the Patriot Act could easily be used by an elected government that wishes to silence values voters.
    So I really think Christians ought to take a serious look at Ron Paul, especially now that he is proving himself more competitive.

  • James

    The establishement media does not want to rendor you insignificant as you are their biggest asset and are doing the dirty work for them by embracing a liberal republican. The media has no issues with Santorum – He is in support of the centralized bank (Federal Reserve) one of the major pillars in communism, supports a bloated Federal Government – ie no child left behind, ferderal prescritption drug benefit, voted the raise the debt ceiling several times, supported Mitt Romney, supported Arlene Spector…
    The media form both the so called left and right want to make Ron Paul irrelevant and you are all being used as a tool.
    Ron Paul is the only candidate that can beat Obama – look at the stats – He receives the largest chunk of independent voters and young voters. You need to those votes in the general election.

  • Pingback: Go Big or Go Home | Steve Deace « Christian News Tweets

Deace on TV