“If you have courage and convictions, your new soulmate will be Steve Deace. He delivers.” —Mike Huckabee

Radio shows

A Panhandler’s View of Last Night’s Debate

by David Jeffers

If ever there was a more boring debate than tonight in my 32 years of following them, memory does not serve me well. Perhaps the after effects? And to quote a tweeter, the applause communism rule made the debate boring, which was meant to help Romney.

I think I’m going to watch reruns of the 1960 Kennedy – Nixon Debate and throw in Nixon’s classic Checkers speech just to rediscover my love for politics.

That being said here’s my take on what one Floridian saw. And for full disclosure I endorsed Newt Gingrich right before the New Year.

Newt Gingrich: Newt shrewdly played the frontrunner under the relentless and ridiculous barrage of attacks from Mitt Romney. Newt played the elder statesman and let Romney flail away in the air missing Newt’s chin by a good two feet. I know that I am a Newt supporter, but was anyone actually impressed with Romney’s attacks? You wouldn’t have to know Newt’s record to tell Romney was lying, just like you don’t have to have the evidence when you know your child is lying to you. You just know.

Newt proves his intellectual prowess in his answers on foreign affairs. This will play well in the Tampa, Jacksonville, and Panhandle areas, which have large active and retired military populations. I have not met one active duty or retired military person who favors Barack Obama’s/Ron Paul’s foreign policy, and I work with them every day.

Illegal immigration is a big issue here in Florida and any candidate who tries to placate to the Tom Tancredo crowd will lose the all-important Hispanic vote. However, “hispandering” will not work because most Hispanic conservatives I’ve talked with want a realistic but comprehensive approach to solving the issue. They are all in favor of securing the borders, enforcing the current laws, especially when it comes to illegal hiring, but they also want a compassionate approach to dealing with those families who came here illegally but have resided here for a long time. Only Newt has a realistic plan, which he alluded to a bit tonight on his answer about the Dream Act, and it will please the important Hispanic vote.

Newt showed his intellectual superiority by turning the liberally-biased question of “why didn’t the Bush tax cuts work” and gave a lesson on economic realities that we as a nation must face. That will make the many fiscal conservatives I know comfortable.

Overall Newt’s performance was subdued yet strong for a front-runner. I give him a weak A-.

Mitt Romney: Thankfully for Willard he had NBC to triage his campaign after the sucking chest wound he suffered in South Carolina. I can tell you my circle of influence were stunned by the margin and depth of Newt’s victory. Once solid Romney people are getting weak-kneed.

As I stated earlier, Mitt’s attacks were not only pathetic, most of them were lies of which Mitt will suffer for later this week, especially with the conservative Panhandle and large military population in Florida. Integrity is a must for us and Mitt’s lies will surely find him out.

Mitt’s “Bill Clinton ‘I feel your pain’ pandering” might play with some Floridians, but most of those are not registered Republicans so they can’t vote for Mitt in the primary. The only thing missing was Mitt biting his lower lip. I’d be surprised if that played well at all with conservatives.

I think Mitt Romney actually hurt himself more with Florida voters than most of the pundits’ initial reactions. I still give him second, but this was one of his worse debate performances. Note to Romney’s handlers: you not dealing with Governor Rick Perry now; you’re dealing with one of the smartest men alive today on Planet Earth. So to borrow a phrase from the good Governor of Texas, if you’re gonna go after Newt, you better bring it!

The most stunning moment for me was Romney’s insistence that people look at his conservative record as Governor. He might want to rethink that but hey, I’m here to help. Read it here.

I would give Romney’s overall performance a shaky B. Had he not anemically attacked Newt I would have given him a strong B+.

Rick Santorum: I asked this question a couple of times on my twitter feed and I am still wondering. Did Rick Santorum look physically ill to you tonight? He did to me; his face seemed flush and puffed up, and he began the debate almost lifeless. For those Floridians seeing him for the first time on television many were probably wondering what the fuss was all about. He came across as much ado about nothing.

Senator Santorum has got to learn to stay away from the policy minutiae; it kills Joe and Jane Sixpack to the point of their eyes rolling back in their head. The difference between Rick and Newt talking economic issues is because of Newt’s intellectual superiority he can explain it clearer and in fewer words than Santorum. The comparison is stunning.

Santorum was solid as usual on foreign policy, especially tying present-day Cuba to Venezuela and Islamic terrorism. That played very well up here in the Panhandle and around military bases in Florida, but mostly so in South Florida. I’d give him 2 RBI’s on that answer.

Where he struck out with the bases-loaded was his insistence on having the only conservative bona fides. Obviously he’s not read Steve’s devastating article today, Santorum’s Choice. I’ll be sure as many Florida voters I know do in the next few days.

As Steve wrote, Santorum “may never have as much leverage on the national stage than he does right now” and after tonight’s performance that leverage slipped a view PSI’s. I think Rick Santorum would make a great Vice-President and a Newt/Santorum ticket and administration would be formidable in the lawmaking and policy enforcement ability. They could definitely count on Florida’s all-important 29 electoral votes.

I give Santorum a B- on his performance tonight, instead of a C+ because I still believe he was not feeling well tonight.

Ron Paul: All tonight did was move Paul further into irrelevance, particularly with the Florida Republican undecideds. He said nothing to earn any of those votes, but surely said plenty to lose them. Of course his answers on fiscal matters will play well with fiscal conservatives here in the Sunshine State, but he gained very few converts.

In a military rich state like Florida, his cockamamie foreign policy no doubt stunned those hearing it for the first time. And for those who may have heard he’d become a stronger candidate, his views on Iran made many in uniform and those who have retired their uniforms shake their head in disbelief. I predict Ron Paul will be lucky to pull 15% in the Florida primary.

There were a couple of “love” moments between Newt and the good doctor and I think Ron Paul as Treasury Secretary in the Gingrich Administration would be a good fit.

Paul get’s a solid C for tonight’s performance.

Overall prediction: Newt gains 2 or 3 points; Romney lose 2 or 3 points; Santorum gained very little if any undecideds, and Paul lost any chance he had of finishing a strong third place.

 

Dave Jeffers is the Founder and President of Aletheia Group L.L.C and author of “Understanding Evangelicals: A Guide to Jesusland”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Daniel-Cesar/100000531429803 Daniel Cesar

    Thank you for your insightful analysis. This is one Iowan that apprciated it.

  • Anonymous

    Barack Obama’s/Ron Paul’s foreign policy? It is clear you understand very little about which you write. Paul’s foreign policy is the exact opposite of Barack Obama’s. Unbelievable. All reading this article did is move you to further irrelevance in my reading list. I don’t mind anti-Paul articles if they are intelligent. Yours is just plain ignorant. Please educate yourself on these candidates before publishing articles about them.

    • Ken

      I
      agree, I think it would have read better if he had used the word ‘or’ instead
      of separating their names with a ‘/’. 
      The forward slash does make it sound like he was grouping them together
      as one entity.

  • Ross Pomroy

    Sounds to me like you will be fooled again.

  • Bill H

    It still amazes me that everyone can list many concerns regarding Mitt, Newt, Rick and Ron. I am quite sure everyone who reads these posts knows them all, but this writer points out Ron Paul’s  “cockamamie foreign policy” will be his undoing. I haven’t had anyone explain to me adequately when “The Golden Rule” has ceased to apply? The Golden Rule is based on the Christian principle of love thy neighbor as thyself. If a principle is true, then it is valid on every level no matter who or what is involved from individuals to groups to States to nations. If it is not true, who picks and chooses where is applies and where it doesn’t? And Based on what? It seems to me “Christian” writers and bloggers should be defending Ron Paul’s stance but they are not. Why don’t they? They pontificate pro-life and marriage issues, but they leave this Christian principle back in the kitchen and don’t bring it to the table. Can someone shed some light? We complain about our government picking winners and losers in the corporate world and it appears to me that government is doing the same thing with other nations from military action to monetary subsidies. If we don’t like it in one area (corporate), why is it okay in another (nations). Serial Hypocrisy seems to be a good definition and not just some candidates but maybe some Christians too. (As I look at myself in the mirror and see one looking at me.)

    • Anonymous

      Boy you know I couldn’t agree with you more. When we got bombed at Pearl Harbor we should have just used the Golden Rule but instead, hey wait a minute, maybe we did! You kind of mis quoted the Golden Rule but that’s ok I think I know what you mean, like Paul and Obama believes that if we just talk nice to the mad man who doesn’t believe the holocaust happened and goes on to say he will wipe Israel off the face of the earth if he ever gets a nuclear bomb and then the US will be next, yeah I think if we just bow down to him – HEY, that’s the problem, Obama hasn’t went over and bowed down to him yet THAT’S THE PROBLEM!! Let’s get Barack and Ron together and draw straws and see which one gets to go do that!

      • James

        Ahmadinejad never said that – That is what the lying media tells you.
        There are two versions of the Ahmadinejad interview – The full version which was aired
        on C-SPAN and the edited 60 minutes interview.
        I suggest you watch the C-SPAN version. I do not defend Ahmadinejad but am not ready to
        beat the war drums for the war profiteers neither and if it does come to that, all Dr. Paul
        has said – Follow the Constitution and make a declaration of war.

        • Anonymous

          I’m going to change my promise to myself once again, I will only reply to Paul followers once. You say that Paul says if it comes to that just declare war – are you crazy? If you think that is all Paul says about it then yes you are crazy. Just as crazy as you thinking that the mad man doesn’t believe the holocaust happened.  Just as crazy as you thinking he is not very willing to use the bomb on Israel.  

          You don’t have to just look at one c-span clip, the man mad says it all the time.

          • James

            Show me! We have been at war most of my life and have not made any declaration of war and worse yet as of late we create the Frankensteins that we end up fighting – Afghanistan, Iraq, soon to be Lybia….We have lost our moral compass and are no longer a constitutional republic but a corrupt empire that uses Terrorism as a scare tactic so we can be felt up and radiated at airports, have our private papers confiscated, warrentless searches, New National Defense Authorization Act which suspends habeas corpus…..And not a peep from either party.
            Yes the Jewish population should be worried indeed they experieinced this nonsense once.

      • Bill H

        Cecil, So what is the “Golden Rule”? If I misquoted something, what is the correct quote? Who determines when to apply the rule and who doesn’t? And to whom shall it be applied to and not applied to? I am not trying to be a pest. I am honestly having difficulty with definitions and meanings. Kinda like the word referencing the group called conservatives. No one has clearly defined this name to me either, but one thing at a time. Can you give me straight black and white answers to my four questions above? If not, why not? Thanks

        • Anonymous

          And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise. King James Version.

  • James

    If todays so called Christian right were around approximately 2,000 thousand years ago – They would have shouted for the release of barabbas.
    There is no room for the ‘prince of peace’ in your hypocrisy and foolish rhetoric.

  • Scott

    Concerning Christians and “Golden Rule” foriegn policy.  It should be clear to all that America has extended more help to those who needed than anyone else in the world.  That is is doing to others what we would desire for ourselves…a helping hand in time of need.  That said, such a policy cannot be extended to those in the world whose only desire and aim in life is to destroy freedom and liberty as we know it.  Those types of people only understand us when we speak clearly and decisively from a position of strength and military readiness.

Deace on TV
Healthy for Life University video
Healthy for Life University logo

You’ve heard on his show how Steve Deace has lived the Healthy for Life University lifestyle — and how it changed his life forever.
Are you ready for true healing to live that abundant life that you were created for? THIS IS NOT JUST ANOTHER FITNESS OR DIET PROGRAM. It truly will help you change your health.
Watch the video to learn how Healthy for Life University can help you achieve lifelong great health.