“If you have courage and convictions, your new soulmate will be Steve Deace. He delivers.” —Mike Huckabee

Radio shows

What the Iowa Poll Means

By Steve Deace

The Des Moines Register’s latest Iowa Poll provides the most recent benchmark on where things stand down the stretch in the 2012 Iowa Caucuses.

Granted, the Iowa Poll missed forecasting the outcome of the 2010 Republican gubernatorial primary by 19 points, but the poll still is vital because at the very least it provides a snapshot of mindshare if not necessarily market share.

While I don’t believe the results of this poll will come close to being the actual vote total come January 3rd, I do believe the data in the poll has something to say for everybody in the race:

Newt Gingrich

He’s the current trendsetter, and the Iowa Poll confirms what I have been telling media around the country for weeks now—Gingrich is in a strong position because he appears to be a lot of people’s (regardless of what faction of the GOP they represent) second choice. In a race without an unmistakable frontrunner complete with his own devoted following, being everyone’s second choice is a good place to be. However, Gingrich’s propensity to out-kick his coverage will be tested like it wasn’t before when he was second tier. The presidential forum hosted by Mike Huckabee on Fox News provided a preview of the grilling Gingrich is likely to get from ideologically-driven conservatives the rest of the way. If Gingrich stays disciplined and aggressive he will likely emerge as the winner of the Caucuses and the eventual nominee. However, if past history is indicative of future performance, that’s a big “if” in Gingrich’s case.

Ron Paul

He might have the best political organization in the state other than Senators Tom Harkin and Charles Grassley. In fact, Paul may have more loyal allies on the Republican state central committee than Lt. Governor Terry Branstad does. Now that organization is matched by voter enthusiasm in the latest Iowa Poll. If anything, I wonder if Paul’s actual support could be under-reported, because his supporters are the most suspicious of mainstream media and the least responsive to traditional polling mechanisms. For most of this year I have been the lone wolf among analysts saying Paul was a very real threat to win, while others kept clamoring about his perceived ceiling. However, Paul has already exceeded that supposed ceiling. I wonder where Paul would be had he not been flippant about Iran’s nuclear program at the pre-Straw Poll debate. Those comments likely stopped Paul from winning in Ames two days later, and had he won that event he’d be in an even stronger position.

Mitt Romney

For the most poll-driven candidate, this Iowa Poll is very bad news. It’s clear that Romney is losing substantial ground to Gingrich, as establishment Republicans see the grown-up former Speaker as an alternative that is not the anathema to social conservatives that Romney represents. Cain’s departure is also bad news for Romney, since that helps to consolidate the anybody-but-Romney vote. Romney is becoming increasingly isolated as a presidential candidate. He’s now a man without a faction in the party, except those who have a vested interest in him individually. Romney’s only path now is to wait and hope for Gingrich to repeat his history of self-inflicted wounds, leaving the party establishment with no other option but the flip-flopping opportunist 80% of Republicans still don’t want after five years of running for president.

The Conservative Grassroots

Hard to believe after all the conservative uprisings around the country we’ve seen since the rise of the Tea Party movement that there isn’t a true Tea Party champion (or Christian conservative for that matter) anywhere near the first tier of this poll. Straw Poll winner Michele Bachmann is at 8 percent, as is the departed Herman Cain. Rick Perry and Rick Santorum are each at 6 percent. Put all of those numbers together and you come up with 28% of Republicans in the poll, which would be the top spot if it coalesced behind one candidate. Those vying for the conservatives are cannibalizing one another, and their failure to distinguish themselves is Balkanizing conservatives. At some point 1 or 2 of these candidates perhaps have a moral obligation to get out of the race if they’re not going anywhere if they truly care about the issues they’re running on. Otherwise, it may be up to Iowa activists to make that decision for them before it’s too late.

What Really Matters

60% of those polled are still willing to change their minds. 92% of those that consider themselves “soft-committed” to a candidate are open to switching to another candidate. 25% of respondents are concerned about a new revelation about their first choice. Translation—this race is still very fluid and very wide open. For example, the current frontrunner was only at 7% in the last Iowa Poll in October. Other than Paul, whose support is stable, every other candidate is still on probation with Iowa Republicans.

This will be a photo finish, but Gingrich and Paul are the only candidates that control their own destiny. Everyone else is at the mercy of the process, meaning they need someone to falter if they’re to excel.

 

 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1481354920 Craig Bergman

    IF… boy isn’t that THE word of this entire process.  IF.

    IF Paul hadn’t said “Iran can have nukes” and IF the other Paul would have ran, and IF he didn’t say a border fence would be used to keep us IN.  Yeah, then he may be a front runner.  But, he did say all those things and thus he DOES have a ceiling of 20%.  Maybe not in Iowa.  Maybe he could od the improbable and there could be bad weather and he pulls the win.  So what?  He does not have these factors in NH or SC.  In SC he actually has basically NOTHING.  So, his national base remains 10%.

    And of course, IF Gingrich does not stumble.  IF his new TV Ad is any indication, he is only going to get better.  That Ad is brilliant, positive and reaches out with a nod to the Fair Tax crowd which is some 8,000 strong in Iowa.  And we all know how they influenced Huckbees win, it was not just the Church vote.

    • http://twitter.com/squirekyle KGP

      nope, Gingrich is 99% likely to be this month’s flavor, then fall just like the rest have…  Ron Paul, however,  is the “flavor of the decade”

      • Kevin Alexander

        I saw this television show last night where the Prince to prove he was worthy to slay a dragon first had to slay this big brutish guy.

        The reason I mention that is although the polls don’t show it, I believe that this is Michelle Bachmann’s race to win. But with an important IF. 

        She must “take up the sword”. Metaphorically of course.

        People want to support her. They just don’t think she can “slay the Dragon”.  So if she first metaphorically either take out Romney or Gingrich in the debates, she will sky rocket.  It worked for her before when she took out Pawlenty but why that didn’t last is because it was overshadowed when Rick Perry, who everyone hoped was the Prince, came onto the scene. He soon turned out to be a frog but the momentum was lost.

        Michelle Bachmann must show us, not tell us. That’s the key for her success.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1481354920 Craig Bergman

          I actually agree with you.  And from the King Arthur example.  One of these folks is going to be ABLE to draw the sword and engage the enemy on the issues which matter to all conservatives, fiscal and social.  So far, the only one with a sword is Newt.  But, if he drops it, cuts off his own head or the others learn to use it, they have a shot.  After last night’s debate, they didn’t do what they needed to do, and this race is now Gingrich’s to lose.

  • Anonymous

    “Hard to believe after all the conservative uprisings around the country we’ve seen since the rise of the Tea Party movement that there isn’t a true Tea Party champion (or Christian conservative for that matter) anywhere near the first tier of this poll”

    What in the world is this journalist talking about?

    Tea Party Champion? What about the man who the media themselves declares is the father of the modern Tea Party movement and that is clear to anyone whose researched the origins on the movement? It’s well documented at teaparty11.com. 

    No Christian Conservative? What about the man whose actually been married to the same woman for 50+ years and speaks of the principles of Christ.. that of promoting peace not war.. and following the Constitution in a strictly Conservative way? You must mean some false Christian Conservative that ignores the words of Jesus and promotes aggression with other nations.  Of course, it doesn’t take a genius to know I’m talking about Ron Paul. What a horrible oversight by the author here. It’s almost a slap in the face of his 30 year commitment to such principles, before they went “mainstream”. Get a grip and stop with the denial. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Eric-Heinen/163904030 Eric Heinen

    Concerning foreign policy, Ron Paul was only reiterating exactly what comes from the CIA intelligence and what CIA veteran Michael Scheuer writes and speaks about.  CIA counter-terrorism expert Michael Scheuer would likely be Ron Paul’s choice for Secretary of State. Watch the video and ask yourself if you’d rather have Michael Scheuer or Hillary Clinton at the helm.

    Michael Scheuer Foreign Policy Discussion

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEQviZPyeXk

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/BFlava-Flav/100002544407419 BFlava Flav

    If Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich win the GOP nomination the Tea Party has lost.. RON PAUL 2012

  • hatefalseweight

    Ron Paul already has 20,000 hard commitments.  He has a lot of savvy precinct captains who can win whole precincts by themselves just by identifying a few hard cores and getting them to grab their wives and college aged kids.  Or the college-aged kids grab their parents who don’t know what to do.  Iowa is being swamped with great informational brochures.  Independents will  come over for the good Dr.  Short of fraud, he is a near -lock to win Iowa.

    “Values voters” need to rethink what they really value.  The one-world corporatists are doing everything they can to put to phony socipathic cronies in front of the world to keep the conversation away from Ron Paul.   Washington has the power to end enforcement of abortion laws anytime it wants to.  Same with balancing the budget.  Don’t not be confused with empty political promises of returning America to a high moral state that even a lot of people of conscience don’t really live up to

    http://caucuses.desmoinesregister.com/2011/12/04/three-questions-emerge-from-iowa-poll-results/

    The Paul campaign in Iowa has “hard pledges from 20,000 voters,” Time
    magazine reported Friday. “Given that there are usually between 90,000
    and 115,000 GOP caucusgoers, 20,000 pledges in an eight-way field is
    nothing to sneeze at.”

    Ron Paul new ad on cutting $1trillion year one, eliminating 5 depts … drain the swamp, roll with ronpaul 2012
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXCZVmQ74OA&feature=youtu.be

    For those you know who won’t support Ron Paul because of Iran

    The anglo – american globalists have invaded close to a dozen coutnries, killed over a million people, and have completely encircled Iran.  Yet, they are the aggressors?

    http://www.salon.com/2011/12/04/george_orwell_on_the_evil_iranians/singleton/

    “Do You Still Like Ron Paul, Papa?” An Afternoon Conversation with My Six-Year-Old

    http://www.dailypaul.com/190621/do-you-still-like-ron-paul-papa-an-afternoon-conversation-with-my-six-year-old

  • Max

    Is this something even us conservatives should worry about?

    I don’t want to sound like Ron Paul here but it seems  like we need to be concerned about this.

    http://newsvoice.se/2011/12/02/us-senate-declares-the-entire-usa-to-be-a-battleground/

    • Jacob

      Well it definitely comes from a Leftist news source but yeah, if the information is correct, I believe conservatives should worry.

      It was Benjamin Franklin I believe that said a people who would sacrifice essential liberty for safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.

      This has always been a tough one for me because I also believe that the Constitution can not be a suicide Pact. Sometimes things must bend a bit so it doesn’t break.

      I lost some good conservative friends over the last decade over this issue.  It grieves me because I agree with them in principle. They are the principled ones and principles are important but I also try to “live in the real world”. So there’s the tug and pull I feel when issues like this come up.

      I thought what they did to that American Taliban guy was correct but it did make me feel uncomfortable because I did feel that it was getting close to a line that we can’t afford to cross.  That bill that is discussed at that link, YEAH THAT CROSSES THE LINE!

      Sometimes the Left is right.  It’s strange when that happens but I believe all Americans should be afraid very afraid when that happens. And yeah, the Presidential Candidates do need to be asked about this legislation. We all know what Paul will say but we need to hear the others try to defend this!

      Also, legislation just passed through the House making it easier for foreigners to get US Jobs here in the States. Look I am not against Legal Immigrants but at a time when our unemployment rate is too high?

      No one is covering what is going on with Congress. Well except for of course the whole budget thing, but there’s some real bad stuff going through Congress and conservatives seem so focused on the Presidential campaign that this bad stuff is getting through.

  • Jill

    I really think if you gave time on your program for a Bachmann/Santorum debate, just those two since those are the two that the values voters are split against, I think such a debate will clear things up big time.

    I believe that both would come on your program to debate each other. 

Deace on TV