“If you have courage and convictions, your new soulmate will be Steve Deace. He delivers.” —Mike Huckabee

Radio shows

Republican Party Chooses Sides

by Jen Green

How time flies, huh? Here we are almost a year removed from the Iowa Straw Poll–the first big primary contest of the 2012 Iowa caucus season. Political drama was running high here in my home state back then with folks teaming up behind their favorite primary contender.

We all know how the story ended in January. What many might not know is the Lifetime Movie-of-the-week type script that was running behind the scenes . . . and the after effects of that story that are still affecting Iowa politics today.

It was inevitable that the growing “conservatarian” ranks who support Ron Paul were going to upset the Establishment’s apple cart. After years of setting up networks of grassroots support, positioning supporters in both local and state politics, the Ron Paul revolution has come to Iowa. It became very apparent during the Iowa caucus season just how nervous the establishment was by this faction of the Republican party.

When members of Iowa’s central committee openly supported Ron Paul for the caucuses, the  establishment cried foul. In fact, they said it was “unethical” for leaders of the Republican party to chose sides during a primary–and called for central committee members to remain neutral, to let the process play out, and to promise to support the eventual nominee in the general election.

Now, it seems, the shoe is on the other foot.

It’s primary season here in Iowa, as in many states across the country. And just as we’ve seen in some high profile cases across the country, grassroots conservatives in my state are giving the establishment a run for their money in many key races across Iowa. Fueled by the fact that Republicans have completely squandered a 60 seat majority in the House (and the Governor’s mansion), organizations and small groups have sought out, trained, and supported solid conservative candidates to challenge the system.

And now, some of the same Republican leaders who cried for neutrality during the primary process last year are violating their own “unwritten rule.”

Mailers have been cropping up across Iowa in support of incumbent House Republicans facing strong primary challenges. You can see examples of these fliers below. The ads clearly say they are paid for by “the Republican Party of Iowa” and are mailed using RPI’s non-profit status.

How unethical of them to choose sides in a primary. What a blow to party loyalty for them to divide Republicans in such a way. Why don’t they let the process play out and just commit to supporting the eventual winner against the Democrat in the fall? (Sound familiar?)

After doing some research, I found out the mailers are created by and paid for by the House Majority Fund, which does fall under RPI for reporting purposes. However, the House Majority Fund does have its own director who would be the one allowing and authorizing these expenditures.

From what I’m told, House Majority Fund mailings for incumbents have been done before this primary, but it is a fairly new practice–one which began under previous leadership. Whether the practice will continue remains to be seen.

The mailings do bring up several questions: What standard is applied to choose which races to pit Republicans vs. Republicans? Are these incumbents seen to be in particular trouble?In trouble from whom? Does it matter? Does the establishment have something to gain by keeping these particular incumbents? Why utilize party money that can be used against fighting democrats in the fall to fight off other Republicans–especially if our goal is simply to beat the democrats? 

So far, we’ve seen the mailers pictured below–in the Wolfswinkle vs. Smith primary in district 1 and in the Ung vs. Jorgenson primary from district 6. I hear that we will be seeing more mailers for more House primary races as the week progresses. The primary is Tuesday, June 5.

From what I know about Kevin Wolfswinkle and Matthew Ung, I have no doubt the establishment is threatened by them. . . and that’s a very good thing. They have my full support and endorsement.

I’m not much for neutrality. Or hypocrisy.

Ask yourself, after two years of a Republican governor and a 60 seat majority in the Iowa House, are you any better off? What have we gained? Have we made up any ground at all in the fight for life, marriage, jobs, or smaller government?

Answer those questions, then head to the polls in the June 5th primary.

 

 

  • BarbHeki

    Jen, some conservatives will say they support the incumbent Republican because they think the incumbent has a better chance of beating the Democrat challenger. They are asking the wrong question. The question is not “Who can win?” The question is: “Who is the principled Constitutional conservative?” Then we throw our support behind that person so they will win.I know the logic — we need more R’s than D’s in order to do anything. But, if those Rs vote with Ds on key conservative issues, what good is that? How soon people forget! The R’s don’t always vote for principled, conservative values. Case in point: The Marriage Amendment was killed in the Iowa Senate in 2004 (which had a 29-21 Republican majority) by four Republicans who voted NOT to let the people of Iowa have any say in this matter and to prevent us from voting. Let me repeat that: REPUBLICAN SENATORS KILLED THE MARRIAGE AMENDMENT! These four Republican senators were Maggie Tinsman, Mary Lundby, Don Redfern and Doug Shull. Tinsman is widely attributed as casting the deciding NO vote and I personally heard her explain to a small group of us that we wouldn’t need the Marriage Amendment because she would oppose same-sex marriage if it ever came up in the Legislature. We ousted this 18-year incumbent the following year, replacing her with a principled, truly conservative senator — David Hartsuch. The days are gone when true conservatives will support someone because they attach an “R” to their name. We are principled, educated and discerning of candidates. And our numbers are exploding. The amazing Tea Party movement across the nation, Michele Bachmann’s Tea Party Caucus in Congress and Ron Paul’s Campaign for Liberty all are indicative of this undeniable fact. Give us a few years. We are on a mission to elect people who will return this country to the Constitutional Republic entrusted to us by our Founding Fathers, who recognized that our liberties have been so graciously given to us by God and we must fight fiercely to protect them.

  • Aaron Gunsaulus

    My guess is that, with a little digging, you’d find an inverse correlation between the degree to which a candidate will work to advance the party platform and the amount of help he/she receives from the RPI. 

  • Joel

    Great article, Jen.  Right now Iowa Republicans are starting a gang war within their own party.  Those who have been removed from power are starting to cannibalize the GOP, and it remains to be seen whether this will have a cleansing effect or a destructive effect.  Either way, we have great candidates (including Wolfswinkle, whom I interviewed personally before he received our endorsement) who are showing courage and running for state office, and we need real conservatives to get behind them quickly, before it’s too late.  Anyone who can help us in this critical final week before the primaries, please check out http://www.LibertyIowa.com and sign up to join the ground game.  We have a huge opportunity to take the state back, but it won’t happen unless Christians put their money where their mouth is and get to work, starting with the primaries.

  • Jane_jensen

    It’s funny that your article came out just days after I received a “Paid for by the Republican Party of Iowa” postcard mailing from incumbent House Representative C. Dolechek…..my opponent in the Primary.  I did not realize it was happening all over the State.

    It’s sad that it has come to this, but a) it can only mean that the establishment is afraid, and b) contrary to what they believe, the people see right through it.  I find both encouraging, and I hope the other candidates do, also.

    Stand firm!!!

    Jane C Jensen (candidate)
    House Representative District 24

  • Keith

    Yes I received a political advertisement paid for by Republican party of Iowa Supporting Henry Rayhons over Republican Bob Dishman in Iowa House District 8 race. I feel it is wrong for our Iowa Central Committee to pick favorites. They should be in support of Republicans and spend the money in races against Democrats.

    • Keith

      Also, Rayhons isn’t even the incumbent for my county. Stew Iverson is, so the Iowa establishment isn’t even supporting an incumbent here.

  • Real_Republican

    This story is definitely not over.  Part II, coming to your mailbox soon.
     

Deace on TV